The Ladakh administration has informed the High Court that the cancellation of land allotted to Sonam Wangchuk's Himalayan Institute of Alternatives, Ladakh (HIAL) was a legitimate action, citing the institute's failure to adhere to lease conditions and clear outstanding dues. This defence was presented as the administration addressed the legal challenge concerning the land allotment.

In an affidavit filed on Wednesday, the administration further alleged that Sonam Wangchuk played a role in inciting violence in Leh on September 24, 2025. This unrest reportedly resulted in the deaths of four individuals and injuries to scores of others, following alleged police firing on protesters. The demonstrators were advocating for statehood and the inclusion of Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for the administration of tribal areas.

The administration's stance underscores its position that the cancellation of the land was not solely due to administrative breaches but also linked to broader concerns regarding public order. The affidavit details the severity of the alleged incident, highlighting the casualties and injuries sustained during the protests.

The High Court proceedings are now examining these multiple facets of the administration's decision, balancing the contractual obligations of the land lease with the more serious allegations of public incitement. The outcome of these proceedings will have implications for the future of HIAL and the ongoing discourse surrounding governance and development in the Union Territory of Ladakh.